The Toledo Blade Online
The Toledo Blade OnlineThe Toledo Blade Green Edition
Click here to subscribe or renew!
Temp: 18°
Humidity: 79%
Wednesday, 02/10/10
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Home »   Opinion »   Editorials » 


Click to Receive RSS Feeds!EmailPrint IndexHelp FacebookTwitterDiggDel.icio.usFark

Article published November 02, 2008
The insurance gap

THE justification for charging women two or three times more than men for individual health-insurance policies demands a closer look, preferably by Congress.

From where we sit, the widespread industry practice of charging female insurance clients hundreds of dollars a year more than men of the same age looks an awful lot like gender discrimination.

Such gender differentiation is prohibited by civil rights laws in job-based group insurance coverage. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says employers can't charge higher premiums to women than to men for the same benefits, even if women as a class are more expensive to insure. Insurers in the individual market point out that women ages 19 to 55 tend to cost more to insure than men because they typically use more medical services, especially in the childbearing years.

Recent data from insurance firms and online brokers illustrate new evidence of the size and prevalence of these premium disparities, with women still paying more for insurance that doesn't even cover maternity care. The differences charged by major insurers such as Humana, UnitedHealth, Aetna and Anthem, are astonishing.

Example: A 30-year-old Columbus woman pays 49 percent more than a man of the same age for Anthem's Blue Access Economy plan. At 40, the gap narrows somewhat, with Anthem charging women 38 percent more than men for that policy.

Marcia Greenberger, co-president of the National Women's Law Center, argues that the "wide variation in premiums could not possibly be justified by actuarial principles. "We should not tolerate women [having] to pay more for health insurance, just as we do not tolerate the practice of using race as a factor in setting rates," she said.

At a time when more people are shopping for individual health insurance policies because they've lost jobs that provided coverage, women buying health policies appear to be paying an unfair penalty. And the justification for burdening them with higher monthly premiums because they go to the doctor more often sounds too much like an excuse to discriminate.


Permanent Link

 RECENT RELATED ARTICLES

On health care, Democrats must ‘finish the kitchen’ | 02/09/2010
Care for people at home first | 02/08/2010
Feeding health care | 02/08/2010
School ban on junk food urged | 02/08/2010
President asks GOP to attend summit on health care | 02/08/2010
Fixing a medical miscue | 02/06/2010
Talks take health to heart | 02/05/2010
Doctors make sporting offer | 02/04/2010
Troubling pregnancies | 01/29/2010
Hearty resolutions | 01/28/2010
Take care when working or playing outdoors in winter | 01/25/2010
Dangers of tanning | 01/25/2010
Advanced nurses are not doctors | 01/22/2010
Tiny cut in salt may save lives, U.S. medical costs | 01/22/2010
Health-care risks, goals | 01/21/2010

More related articles »


Cops/Courts
Updated: 6:24 am
Teen in assault to be tried as an adult >>
Blade Area
Updated: 6:23 am
Children's Wonderland equipment is up for sale >>
Cops/Courts
Updated: 6:08 am
Retired Sylvania officer who stole on job gets early release >>
Blade Area
Updated: 6:05 am
Bell stands by raises in face of unions' ire >>
State
Updated: 5:50 am
Strickland defends fee on late license renewal >>
Cops/Courts
Updated: 5:42 am
Ottawa County driver asks lifetime ban after fatality be ended >>
More news stories




ADVERTISING SECTIONS
Tom Henry
Updated: 7:13 am
Playing the odds can help mitigate disasters >>

S. Amjad Hussain
Updated: 5:53 am
France draws line over Muslim women’s dress >>

Marilou Johanek
Updated: 5:54 am
Sense of superiority drove church to 'help' Haitian children >>

Jack Kelly
Updated: 5:42 am
As Democrats schmooze, Obama’s credibility slides  >>

Jack Lessenberry
Updated: 5:32 am
Granholm failed to make case in last Michigan address >>

Rose Russell
Updated: 6:09 am
Even in South Africa, pols' private affairs are people's business >>

David Shribman
Updated: 9:37 am
Love means never saying budget deficit >>

Mike Sigov
Updated: 12:31 pm
Russia's president brings little to the table >>

Tom Walton
Updated: 5:40 am
Apologies in politics are unprecedented >>

More columnist stories
MOST READ STORIES
1.  Snowstorm slaps Toledo region; most activities canceled
2.  Ottawa County driver asks lifetime ban after fatality be ended
3.  Bell stands by raises in face of unions' ire
4.  Retired Sylvania officer who stole on job gets early release
5.  Northwest Ohio's Crystal Bowersox impresses Simon, survives another 'Idol' round
6.  Honda adds 378,000 cars to recall list
7.  Toyota workers become lobbyists for a day
8.  Strickland defends fee on late license renewal
9.  Teen in assault to be tried as an adult
10.  TPS puts income tax of 0.75% on ballot
MOST E-MAILED STORIES
1.  Toledo strip club puts cover charge into quake relief
2.  Tennis champ accused of phone harassment
3.  Officer says 33 dogs seized from suspected puppy mill
4.  Knights' Cromwell steps down
5.  Mental health agency looks to pare $3.5M from services
6.  Homelessness board votes for outside audit; advocate Ken Leslie safe for now
7.  'Stagecoach Mary' broke barriers of race, gender
8.  Sylvania lawyer charged in thefts from 2 clients
9.  Mental health board hears appeals from officials
10.  MAC basketball struggles with fall from elite


AP  News Headlines



AP  Business Headlines



AP  Sports Headlines


AP  Features Headlines
Copyright 2010 The Blade. By using this service, you accept the terms of our privacy statement and our visitor agreement. Please read them.
The Toledo Blade Company, 541 N. Superior St., Toledo, OH 43660, (419) 724-6000
To contact a specific
department or an individual person, click here.
The Toledo Times ®