The Toledo Blade Online
The Toledo Blade OnlineThe Toledo Blade Green Edition
Click here to subscribe or renew!
Temp: 49°
Humidity: 77%
Friday, 11/20/09
Home »   Opinion »   Editorials » 


Click to Receive RSS Feeds!EmailPrint IndexHelp FacebookMySpaceDiggDel.icio.usFark

Article published November 02, 2008
The insurance gap

THE justification for charging women two or three times more than men for individual health-insurance policies demands a closer look, preferably by Congress.

From where we sit, the widespread industry practice of charging female insurance clients hundreds of dollars a year more than men of the same age looks an awful lot like gender discrimination.

Such gender differentiation is prohibited by civil rights laws in job-based group insurance coverage. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says employers can't charge higher premiums to women than to men for the same benefits, even if women as a class are more expensive to insure. Insurers in the individual market point out that women ages 19 to 55 tend to cost more to insure than men because they typically use more medical services, especially in the childbearing years.

Recent data from insurance firms and online brokers illustrate new evidence of the size and prevalence of these premium disparities, with women still paying more for insurance that doesn't even cover maternity care. The differences charged by major insurers such as Humana, UnitedHealth, Aetna and Anthem, are astonishing.

Example: A 30-year-old Columbus woman pays 49 percent more than a man of the same age for Anthem's Blue Access Economy plan. At 40, the gap narrows somewhat, with Anthem charging women 38 percent more than men for that policy.

Marcia Greenberger, co-president of the National Women's Law Center, argues that the "wide variation in premiums could not possibly be justified by actuarial principles. "We should not tolerate women [having] to pay more for health insurance, just as we do not tolerate the practice of using race as a factor in setting rates," she said.

At a time when more people are shopping for individual health insurance policies because they've lost jobs that provided coverage, women buying health policies appear to be paying an unfair penalty. And the justification for burdening them with higher monthly premiums because they go to the doctor more often sounds too much like an excuse to discriminate.


Permanent Link

 RECENT RELATED ARTICLES

U.S. health chief rejects mammogram proposal, backs screenings at 40 | 11/19/2009
Reid reveals Senate version of bill to change U.S. health-care system | 11/19/2009
Report: OSHA should improve safety checks | 11/17/2009
Suspect Medicare payouts total $47B | 11/15/2009
Abortion, not public option, imperils reform | 11/15/2009
Proceed on health-care reform now | 11/13/2009
Health-care reform: too big to fail | 11/13/2009
House Democrats introduce $894B health-care overhaul | 10/30/2009
'Public option' not dirty words | 10/29/2009
Public it is | 10/29/2009
Kirk - Medical marijuana | 10/22/2009
Kirk - Media's priorities | 10/20/2009
Reproach to ideologues | 10/16/2009
Kirk - Health care game plan | 10/15/2009
Health care is also a moral issue | 10/14/2009

More related articles »


Blade Area
Updated: 6:12 am
Toledo leaf pickup may be 1 pass only this year >>
Cops/Courts
Updated: 4:09 pm
Woman sentenced to 13 years for fatal shooting at nude photo shoot
PHOTO >>
Blade Area
Updated: 3:54 pm
Wood County reports first H1N1 death >>
Politics/Elections
Updated: 3:54 pm
McNamara to explore Ohio Senate run >>
Blade Area
Updated: 2:46 pm
Two people killed in Toledo during separate shootings >>
Cops/Courts
Updated: 2:30 pm
Adrian teenager pleads guilty in deaths of parents >>
More news stories




ADVERTISING SECTIONS
Tom Henry
Updated: 7:48 am
Denial, rush to judgment cloud debate over climate >>

S. Amjad Hussain
Updated: 4:26 am
Muslims must do more than condemn acts of violence >>

Marilou Johanek
Updated: 5:58 am
In a dog's life, there's nothing to worry about >>

Jack Kelly
Updated: 5:52 am
Today's PC Army >>

Jack Lessenberry
Updated: 5:56 am
Granholm's shortsighted rhetoric on China hurts state >>

Rose Russell
Updated: 5:53 am
Raving soldiers should face zero tolerance, like students >>

David Shribman
Updated: 6:34 am
Abortion, not public option, imperils reform >>

Mike Sigov
Updated: 6:26 am
GM acted wisely by hitting brakes on Russian deal >>

Tom Walton
Updated: 5:00 am
Young adult binge drinking nothing to slough off >>

More columnist stories
MOST READ STORIES
1.  Skeldon resigns; Lucas County dog warden's last work day is Dec. 31
2.  Former Lutheran pastor dies because of trauma of 2-car accident
3.  Woman sentenced to 13 years for fatal shooting at nude photo shoot
4.  Settlement likely over Hartung’s firing suit
5.  Racial makeup of Port Authority staff questioned
6.  Two people killed in Toledo during separate shootings
7.  New citizens get OSU-UM rivalry tips
8.  Wood County reports first H1N1 death
9.  Toledo leaf pickup may be 1 pass only this year
10.  In a dog's life, there's nothing to worry about
MOST E-MAILED STORIES
1.  Owens failed to address shortcomings in nursing
2.  BGSU plans for 2 new dormitories
3.  Buckeyes sport retro look of 1954
4.  Owens students get apology for lost accreditation
5.  Toledo fares poorly in survey
6.  Skeldon says he will step down Dec. 31, but Konop wants him dismissed immediately
7.  Dyer's last-second FG lifts St. Francis
8.  Chrysler boosts Dundee plant; engine line to gain jobs, add output
9.  Springsteen delivers a classic concert in Detroit on Friday
10.  Company outlines $37.5M port plan


AP  News Headlines



AP  Business Headlines



AP  Sports Headlines


AP  Features Headlines
Copyright 2009 The Blade. By using this service, you accept the terms of our privacy statement and our visitor agreement. Please read them.
The Toledo Blade Company, 541 N. Superior St., Toledo, OH 43660, (419) 724-6000
To contact a specific
department or an individual person, click here.
The Toledo Times ®